MENU

by • November 15, 2010 • Best of, Business models, Tools & frameworksComments (8)251

Minivid iteration case study

This is a 3-iteration case study about a small animation widget, hopefully showing a business model in motion.

If you are unfamiliar with the layout of Osterwalder’s canvas, here’s a reference.

1. The destination site

We started with a site featuring a “viral” widget plus user-generated content. This was right when the Facebook platform was about to launch.

What we learned:

  • Terrible sharing rates and traffic growth
  • Fantastic engagement and interaction rates
  • Brands keep calling us wanting to license the tech

Based on:

  • 3 months of site/widget/app analytics
  • About a dozen conversations with big brands
  • Lots of failed pitches to industry experts (ie investors)

2. The accidental agency

Our revenue plan (ads) depended on scale and our distribution channel wasn’t working. Brands had money and existing online audiences and we had a fun social experience with strong engagement metrics (learned from phase 1). Unfortunately, they wouldn’t buy the tech without full-service creative & support, which forced us into doing much more agency-style work (e.g. art & campaign management) than we intended.

What we learned:

  • We are terrible at sales
  • We can’t scale a full-service model
  • Brand safety (moderation & curation of content) is a big deal

Based on:

  • About $100k in sales to entertainment/lifestyle brands
  • One complete disaster with a nightmare customer
  • Dozens of failed sales

3. The technology provider

We had run into a case of founder-model misfit, where we were neither able nor willing to deliver a quality full-service experience.

At this point, we could either re-focus on our users (trying to boost growth & monetization) or double down on the brands and find a way to make that work. We liked the idea of prioritizing users, and we wasted a ton of time on a technically & creatively remarkable product that nobody wanted. The sound of crickets from our users coincided with the closing of a licensing deal we’d been working on for nine (!) months and nudged us back toward the brand option.

We needed to change the channel (sales) and relationship (full-service), so we started partnering with creative agencies. They could win more pitches and save money by having us in their toolbox, and we wouldn’t have to directly sell to or support the brands. This is when we moved from San Francisco to London surround ourselves with the world’s best creative agencies.

What we learned:

  • We found a good solution to a real problem
  • Minivid is niche — we need more products to scale
  • Agency partnerships are slow

Based on:

  • About $150k in sales via creative agencies
  • Hundreds of discovery meetings with everyone imaginable

4, 5, 6 and beyond!

At this point a small-scale version of the model was basically validated and we needed to scale it by going broader than just Minivid. We went through about 3 more major iterations, which mostly involved changing the product & value prop while leaving the rest of the model the same.

In terms of timing, we spent roughly a year and a half on the Minivid models described above, and another 18 months on the subsequent set of models. That works out to about an interation every 6 months, which seems slow until you consider that our customer validation was constrained by a 3-6 month sales cycle.

Apart from the debacle mentioned at the beginning of section 3, we were pretty good about getting in front of customers. In retrospect, I can see that the biggest mistakes happened when we thought we knew what we were doing. When we clearly knew nothing about the market and customers, it was really obvious that we needed to go outside and start talking to people (ages before we’d heard of customer development). But once we thought we were experts, it got a lot easier to justify hiding indoors.

Related Posts

8 Responses to Minivid iteration case study

  1. ass says:

    Hello! Would you mind if I share your blog with my zynga group? There’s a lot of folks that I think would really enjoy your content. Please let me know. Thanks

    • robfitz says:

      Please do — I’m writing this with the hope that people read it ;). If you’re putting excerpts elsewhere just throw a link back in there somewhere.

      Shoot me an email if anything else pops up (minivid questions, etc) I might be able to help with.

  2. I just discovered your blog publish and have recently been studying together. There are many associated with strange comments, nevertheless typically I merely agree with what are the some other commenters are usually creating. With the amount of nicegreat testimonials involving this site, I figured that i would certainly furthermore join in as well as explain how I truly enjoyed looking over this submit. So i believe this could be my personal 1st remark: “I can see that you’ve produced several truly unusual things. Not really a lot of people would actually look at this the way you only would. I am just really satisfied that there are much about this subject which has been discovered and you did it consequently nicely, with much class!inch

  3. Outstanding, that’s exactly a few things i was looking for! You may ended up saving myself numerous work

  4. your sharing, it’s very useful|One again, your article is very nice|One again, your articles is very good.thank you!very much.|One again, your idea is very

  5. ninjauCPT says:

    Chuck norris is the beast, and my best friend i never had.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>