<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for @robfitz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestartuptoolkit.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestartuptoolkit.com/blog</link>
	<description>Figuring out early stage startups</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:04:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.27</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Calendar time vs clock time (AKA why &#8220;should I quit my job?&#8221; is a bad question) by Henrik Bergström</title>
		<link>http://thestartuptoolkit.com/blog/2018/08/calendar-time-vs-clock-time-aka-why-should-i-quit-my-job-is-a-bad-question/#comment-57559</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henrik Bergström]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartuptoolkit.com/blog/?p=2324#comment-57559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great insights and it&#039;s important to remember that it&#039;s not only your lunch breaks you can use for &quot;starting up&quot;. If you set aside everything else you can easily get 20 hours of work done during a weekend. One hour of work before/after your day job adds 5 more hours per week.

So you can easily work 20-25 hours per week on your startup without quitting your job.

Another important thing is outsourcing/delegation. If you realise you need to put a lot of &quot;clock time&quot;, it doesn&#039;t mean you have to do it yourself! Hire someone else to do it for you and then you only have to spend time coordinating the work.

In that way you can transfer clock time into calendar time again, since all you do is &quot;sit around waiting&quot; for the other person to complete the clock time-bound tasks.

If you deal with physical products you will also have to endure a lot of calendar time while the products are produced and then shipped to you or your customers. All that can easily add up to 3-12 months of &quot;just waiting&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great insights and it&#8217;s important to remember that it&#8217;s not only your lunch breaks you can use for &#8220;starting up&#8221;. If you set aside everything else you can easily get 20 hours of work done during a weekend. One hour of work before/after your day job adds 5 more hours per week.</p>
<p>So you can easily work 20-25 hours per week on your startup without quitting your job.</p>
<p>Another important thing is outsourcing/delegation. If you realise you need to put a lot of &#8220;clock time&#8221;, it doesn&#8217;t mean you have to do it yourself! Hire someone else to do it for you and then you only have to spend time coordinating the work.</p>
<p>In that way you can transfer clock time into calendar time again, since all you do is &#8220;sit around waiting&#8221; for the other person to complete the clock time-bound tasks.</p>
<p>If you deal with physical products you will also have to endure a lot of calendar time while the products are produced and then shipped to you or your customers. All that can easily add up to 3-12 months of &#8220;just waiting&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About &amp; contact by Hallod</title>
		<link>http://thestartuptoolkit.com/blog/about-contact/#comment-55446</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hallod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2018 04:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thestartuptoolkit.com/?page_id=223#comment-55446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ux136hgcwl34z0ictoiuqpl0n89q9143v3067yobp2ojm4szml 
 
DypF0XtwoV2bEk]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ux136hgcwl34z0ictoiuqpl0n89q9143v3067yobp2ojm4szml </p>
<p>DypF0XtwoV2bEk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The big ideas by DarcySmall</title>
		<link>http://thestartuptoolkit.com/blog/series-and-topics/#comment-54394</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DarcySmall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2017 04:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartuptoolkit.com/blog/?page_id=1621#comment-54394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have checked your website and i&#039;ve found some duplicate content, that&#039;s why you 
don&#039;t rank high in google, but there is a tool that can help you 
to create 100% unique content, search for; Boorfe&#039;s tips unlimited content]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have checked your website and i&#8217;ve found some duplicate content, that&#8217;s why you<br />
don&#8217;t rank high in google, but there is a tool that can help you<br />
to create 100% unique content, search for; Boorfe&#8217;s tips unlimited content</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Unconditionals by Stevan</title>
		<link>http://thestartuptoolkit.com/blog/2017/05/unconditionals/#comment-52728</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stevan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 14:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartuptoolkit.com/blog/?p=2318#comment-52728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Completely agree with this. I think this is the big problem with pivot culture. When people start a company we consider founder-startup fit i.e. is this founder suitable for the company they are starting? This includes if they are passionate about it or not. Very few people re-evaluate this when a company pivots and its easy to pivot (or pivot, pivot and pivot again) into a space that a founder may have no passion for (which is ultimately pretty crushing for the soul).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely agree with this. I think this is the big problem with pivot culture. When people start a company we consider founder-startup fit i.e. is this founder suitable for the company they are starting? This includes if they are passionate about it or not. Very few people re-evaluate this when a company pivots and its easy to pivot (or pivot, pivot and pivot again) into a space that a founder may have no passion for (which is ultimately pretty crushing for the soul).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on High stakes learning by Jakub Kostecki</title>
		<link>http://thestartuptoolkit.com/blog/2017/02/high-stakes-learning/#comment-51724</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jakub Kostecki]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartuptoolkit.com/blog/?p=2308#comment-51724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Rob, thanks for your post on swapping equity, taking money off the table and other ways of reducing startup risk. I was wondering if you have some more information / resources on equity swapping. A Google search didn&#039;t lead me to anything noteworthy and I&#039;m looking to learn more about this way of mitigating risk while building startups.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rob, thanks for your post on swapping equity, taking money off the table and other ways of reducing startup risk. I was wondering if you have some more information / resources on equity swapping. A Google search didn&#8217;t lead me to anything noteworthy and I&#8217;m looking to learn more about this way of mitigating risk while building startups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Accidental charlatans by Losing while being right, winning while being wrong &#124; @robfitz &#124; Figuring out early stage startups</title>
		<link>http://thestartuptoolkit.com/blog/2017/01/accidental-charlatans/#comment-51535</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Losing while being right, winning while being wrong &#124; @robfitz &#124; Figuring out early stage startups]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 09:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartuptoolkit.com/blog/?p=2262#comment-51535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] other words, wild success does not justify idiotic behaviour and failure in the end does not invalidate a wise [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] other words, wild success does not justify idiotic behaviour and failure in the end does not invalidate a wise [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Accidental charlatans by Henrik Bergstrom</title>
		<link>http://thestartuptoolkit.com/blog/2017/01/accidental-charlatans/#comment-51520</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henrik Bergstrom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2017 18:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartuptoolkit.com/blog/?p=2262#comment-51520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great insights, Rob!

I&#039;ve also been thinking a lot about the advice given by successful entrepreneurs, but from a different perspective.

You often hear them (proudly and emotionally) telling the story about how the made it. The struggles, the hustling, the crazy credit card debts, etc.

But when asked for advice they almost always say &quot;I would never do it like that again&quot; and then they start talking about &quot;how to do things the right way&quot; although they have no experience of doing things that way.

Isn&#039;t this strange? They have a proven example of how to do it, but tell everyone else to do it another way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great insights, Rob!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also been thinking a lot about the advice given by successful entrepreneurs, but from a different perspective.</p>
<p>You often hear them (proudly and emotionally) telling the story about how the made it. The struggles, the hustling, the crazy credit card debts, etc.</p>
<p>But when asked for advice they almost always say &#8220;I would never do it like that again&#8221; and then they start talking about &#8220;how to do things the right way&#8221; although they have no experience of doing things that way.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t this strange? They have a proven example of how to do it, but tell everyone else to do it another way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Surplus time by Default culture, contagious culture &#124; @robfitz &#124; Figuring out early stage startups</title>
		<link>http://thestartuptoolkit.com/blog/2017/01/surplus-time/#comment-51256</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Default culture, contagious culture &#124; @robfitz &#124; Figuring out early stage startups]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartuptoolkit.com/blog/?p=2254#comment-51256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] cultures vary, but the quality of urgency/busyness is always present. Although busyness hurts the business[1], it&#8217;s fiercely contagious since the infected (aka busy people) are visibly suffering and [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] cultures vary, but the quality of urgency/busyness is always present. Although busyness hurts the business[1], it&#8217;s fiercely contagious since the infected (aka busy people) are visibly suffering and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Three concepts/books that will improve your life by Surplus time &#124; @robfitz &#124; Figuring out early stage startups</title>
		<link>http://thestartuptoolkit.com/blog/2017/01/three-conceptsbooks-that-will-improve-your-life/#comment-51226</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Surplus time &#124; @robfitz &#124; Figuring out early stage startups]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartuptoolkit.com/blog/?p=2233#comment-51226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] around means you can pounce on limited-time deals noone else can pursue. It&#8217;s Taleb&#8217;s Black Swan strategy: expect to lose small so you can eventually win big. It&#8217;s hard to notice the problem [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] around means you can pounce on limited-time deals noone else can pursue. It&#8217;s Taleb&#8217;s Black Swan strategy: expect to lose small so you can eventually win big. It&#8217;s hard to notice the problem [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy byproducts of startup work (even if the startup doesn&#8217;t) by Kicking the ambition addiction &#124; @robfitz &#124; Figuring out early stage startups</title>
		<link>http://thestartuptoolkit.com/blog/2017/01/happy-byproducts-of-startup-work-even-if-the-startup-doesnt/#comment-51138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kicking the ambition addiction &#124; @robfitz &#124; Figuring out early stage startups]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 11:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestartuptoolkit.com/blog/?p=2129#comment-51138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] I&#8217;d developed some skills, people started wanting to pay me to do stuff for them. They offered good money, but I refused to [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I&#8217;d developed some skills, people started wanting to pay me to do stuff for them. They offered good money, but I refused to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.307 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2018-11-22 18:33:46 -->
